A facility calls in experts to review evidence developed in research and develop guidelines for clinical practice. Which stage of EBP is represented?

The scenario described involves bringing in experts to review evidence and formulate clinical practice guidelines, which is a core activity associated with the translation of research into actionable recommendations for healthcare practice. This stage of Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) involves synthesizing findings from various studies and expert opinions to create guidelines that can be implemented effectively in clinical settings.

The translation to guidelines phase is crucial, as it bridges the gap between the evidence generated by research and the practical application of that evidence in everyday clinical decisions and procedures. This ensures that healthcare providers have clear, evidence-based recommendations to follow, which enhances the quality of care and improves patient outcomes.

When considering other options, the implementation of new practices focuses on the actual application of these guidelines in clinical settings. The assessment of outcomes pertains to evaluating the effectiveness of practices that have been implemented, while continuous improvement emphasizes ongoing evaluation and refinement of practices based on new evidence or outcomes. Each of these stages is significant in the EBP process, but the specific act of developing guidelines from reviewed evidence aligns directly with the translation to guidelines phase.